Author/Treatment | Patients Total No. | Prior treatment | Efficacy response (%) | Survival | ||||||||
PFS | OS (%) | |||||||||||
Radiation therapy (%) | Chemotherapy (%) | CR | PR | Median (months) | 6 months (%) | Median (months) | 6 months | 1 year | 2 years | 10 years | ||
KREISL et al., 2009 BVZ; First stage alone, Second stage with irinotecan [29] | 48 | All | All | 2 | 33 | 4 | 29 | 7.7 | 57 | |||
FRIEDMAN et al., 2009 Randomized trial assessing BVZ alone with BVZ and irinotecan [30] | 85* | All | All | 1.2 | 27 | 4.2 | 42.6 | 9.2 | ||||
CHAMBERLAIN et al., 2010 Retrospective analysis of BVZ alone [31] | 50 | All | All | 0 | 58 | 42 | 8.5 | |||||
BURKHARDT et al., 2012 Phase I trial of intra-arterial BVZ after blood brain barrier disruption [32] | 14 | All | All | 0 | 57 | 10 | 8.8 | |||||
RAIZER et al., 2010 Erlotinib, Phase II [33] | 38 | All | All | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | ||||
IWAMOTO et al., 2010 Pazopanib, Phase II [34] | 35 | All | All | 0 | 5.7 | 3 | 3 | 8 | ||||
GALANIS et al., 2009 Vorinostat, Phase II study [35] | 66 | All | All | 0 | 3 | 15.2 | 5.7 | |||||
GALANIS et al., 2005 Temsirolimus, Phase II study [36] | 65 | All | 45 | 0 | 0 | 7.8 | 5.2 | |||||
SATHORNSUMETEE et al., 2010 Phase II analysis of BVZ and erlotinib [37] | 25 | All | All | 4 | 44 | 4 | 26 | 10.5 | ||||
REARDON et al., 2010 Erlotinib and sirolimus, Phase II study [38] | 32 | All | All | 0 | 0 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 7.9 | ||||
LU-EMERSON et al., 2011 Dasatinib and BVZ retrospective study [39] | 14 | All | All | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2.5 | ||||
REARDON et al., 2011 Sorafenib and TMZPhase II study [40] | 32 | All | All | 0 | 3 | 1.5 | 6.4 | 10.3 | ||||
FRIDAY et al., 2012 Vorinostat and bortezomib, Phase II study [41] | 37 | All | All | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.2 | |||||
S. R. Burzynski et al., 2014 ANP, Phase II study RGBM | 30 | 87 | 67 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 2.1 | 16.7 | 8.3 | 55.5 | 34.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
S. R. Burzynski et al., 2014 ERGBM | 24 | 88 | 75 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 2.4 | 20.8 | 11.2 | 65.5 | 39.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 |